Problem
No destination, or a fake one
Pattern 01 says to define what "done" looks like before you start. Most of the time that's right. But some work can't be defined up front: a new strategy, an early product idea, a problem nobody has framed yet. You don't know what good looks like until you've seen something that isn't it.
People handle this in one of three ways, and all three fail. Some skip the destination and just start prompting. The AI is happy to go wherever they point it, so they go around in circles - twenty drafts, each different, none better, and no way to tell when to stop.
Others write a destination anyway and treat it as fixed. Three rounds in, they've learned the real question is different, but the original goal is still steering the work. They end up with a polished answer to the wrong question.
And some do iterate - but with no limit. The destination changes every week and never locks. The work feels busy and never finishes, and the sponsor stops believing it ever will.
The failure isn't starting without a clear destination. It's never writing down where you think you're going, so you can't tell whether you're getting closer.
Value
Exploration that converges
Context
When this pattern applies
Use it when you can't fill in Pattern 01's destination honestly before you start: new strategy or positioning, an early-stage product or service idea, research into a question nobody has framed, a first attempt at something your organization has never done.
It's also the right pattern when a sponsor says "I'll know it when I see it." Turn that into a written guess you can both react to.
Organizations already know this discipline from funding. They fund a discovery or research phase before they fund the final product, because nobody can write the final destination yet - and the research phase ends with a sharper destination and a decision. This pattern is the same discipline at the scale of one piece of AI work.
When not to use it: when the destination is knowable and you're just skipping the work of writing it down. If you could fill in Pattern 01's format, audience, constraints and success criteria in five minutes, do that instead.
Solution
Write the destination as a guess, then rewrite it every round
Notes
A companion to Pattern 01
Use it with Pattern 01. Begin with the End in Mind says to define the destination first. When you honestly can't, this pattern is how you get there - and once the destination locks, you switch back to Pattern 01.
An example. The first plan for our ten-minute sessions was eight slides and a linear run sheet. It didn't tell the story the way it needed to. The destination was rewritten - a five-act arc, about ten minutes, half of it live - and every draft after that moved toward it. Version 1 was a guess; it did its job by being wrong in a useful way.